Home  ›  You Can Sit Around and Wait a Hundred Years but You Ain t Gonna Hear Anything Like This Again

You Can Sit Around and Wait a Hundred Years but You Ain t Gonna Hear Anything Like This Again

Written By Sunday, May 15, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Phenomenon that attempting to hide data attracts more attention to it

The original epitome of Barbra Streisand'due south residence in Malibu, which she attempted to suppress in 2003

The Streisand consequence is a phenomenon that occurs when an try to hibernate, remove, or censor information has the unintended consequence of increasing sensation of that data, oftentimes via the Internet. It is named after American vocalist Barbra Streisand, whose endeavour to suppress the California Littoral Records Project'south photograph of her residence in Malibu, California, taken to certificate California coastal erosion, inadvertently drew greater attending to the photograph in 2003.[ane]

Attempts to suppress information are often made through end-and-desist messages, just instead of existence suppressed, the information receives extensive publicity, equally well equally media extensions such every bit videos and spoof songs, which can be mirrored on the Internet or distributed on file-sharing networks.[2] [3]

The Streisand effect is an instance of psychological reactance, wherein once people are aware that some data is being kept from them, they are significantly more motivated to admission and spread that data.[4]

In some cases, seeking or obtaining an injunction to prohibit something from being published leads to increased publicity.

Etymology [edit]

Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the term in 2005 after a holiday resort issued a takedown notice to urinal.net (a site dedicated to photographs of urinals) over its use of the resort's name.[5] [half-dozen]

How long is it going to take earlier lawyers realize that the simple act of trying to repress something they don't like online is probable to go far so that something that nearly people would never, always see (like a photo of a urinal in some random embankment resort) is at present seen by many more people? Allow's call it the Streisand Issue.[6]

The term alluded to Barbra Streisand, who in 2003 had sued photographer Kenneth Adelman and Pictopia.com for violation of privacy.[7] [8] The United states of america$fifty one thousand thousand lawsuit endeavored to remove an aeriform photograph of Streisand'southward mansion from the publicly bachelor collection of 12,000 California coastline photographs.[2] [9] [10] Adelman photographed the beachfront belongings to certificate littoral erosion as role of the California Coastal Records Projection, which was intended to influence regime policymakers.[11] [12] Before Streisand filed her lawsuit, "Prototype 3850" had been downloaded from Adelman's website only half-dozen times; two of those downloads were by Streisand's attorneys.[xiii] As a result of the example, public knowledge of the picture increased profoundly; more than 420,000 people visited the site over the post-obit month.[fourteen] The lawsuit was dismissed and Streisand was ordered to pay Adelman'southward legal fees, which amounted to $155,567.[15] [16] [17]

Examples [edit]

In politics and government [edit]

In November 2007, Tunisia blocked access to YouTube and Dailymotion afterward cloth was posted depicting Tunisian political prisoners. Activists and their supporters then started to link the location of then-President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali'due south palace on Google Earth to videos nearly civil liberties in general. The Economist said this "turned a low-fundamental man-rights story into a fashionable global entrada".[18]

The French intelligence agency DCRI'southward deletion of the French-linguistic communication Wikipedia article about the military radio station of Pierre-sur-Haute[19] resulted in the restored commodity temporarily becoming the most-viewed page on the French Wikipedia.[20]

A 2013 libel adapt by Theodore Katsanevas confronting a Greek Wikipedia editor resulted in members of the project bringing the story to the attention of journalists.[21]

The government of South Africa stated their intention to ban the 2017 book The President's Keepers, detailing corruption inside the government of then-President Jacob Zuma. This acquired sales of the book to spike dramatically, causing the book to sell out within 24 hours earlier the ban was to be put into effect.[22] [23] This fabricated the book a national best seller and led to multiple reprints.

In February 2018, Anne Applebaum wrote in The Washington Post about the Smoothen Holocaust constabulary, which would have criminalized blaming Poles for the Holocaust. She argued that the Streisand outcome would draw more attention to aspects of history that the Polish government preferred to suppress.[24] The legislation is part of the historical policy of the Law and Justice political party which seeks to present a narrative of ethnic Poles exclusively as victims and heroes.[25] [26] [27] The police met with widespread international criticism, equally it was seen as an infringement on freedom of expression and on bookish liberty, and as a barrier to open up discussion on Polish collaborationism,[25] [28] [29] in what has been described as "the biggest diplomatic crunch in [Poland's] contempo history".[30]

A 2018 report of millions of individual responses of Chinese social media users establish that sudden censorship of information by the Chinese government and its affiliates frequently led to mass backlashes, including newfound popularity of VPNs and the subsequent reviewing of entire topic lists on which censored subjects announced.[31] Other researchers found that the backfire tended to consequence in permanent changes to political attitudes and behaviors.[32]

A 2019 report of political imprisonment by the government of Saudi Arabia found that while the incarceration tended to deter individual dissidents from further dissent, it strongly emboldened their social media followers, led to a sharp increment in calls for political reform, and resulted in an increase in online dissent and physical in-person protests overall, including criticism of the ruling family unit and calls for authorities change.[33] Such repression draws public attention to the imprisoned dissidents and their causes, and did non deter other prominent figures in Saudi arabia from continuing to dissent online.[34]

In March 2019, The states (California) Representative Devin Nunes filed a defamation lawsuit confronting Twitter and three users for US$250 million in damages. I user named in the lawsuit, the parody account @DevinCow (Name: Devin Nunes' cow), had 1,200 followers before the lawsuit. The number of followers of @DevinCow soon jumped to 600,000.[35]

In Baronial 2020, it was reported that the Chinese government had blanked out parts of its Baidu mapping platform, and that this could exist used to find a network of buildings begetting hallmarks of prisons and internment camps.[36]

In October 2020, the New York Post published emails from a laptop owned by Presidential candidate Joe Biden'south son Hunter Biden, detailing an alleged corruption scheme.[37] Twitter blocked the story from their platform and locked the accounts of those who shared a link to the article, including the New York Post 'south own Twitter business relationship, and White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, among others.[38] Researchers at MIT cited the increase of 5.5 grand shares every fifteen minutes to nigh 10 thousand shares shortly after Twitter censored the story, every bit prove of the Streisand Effect nearly doubling the attention the story received.[39]

In March 2022, incumbent Australian federal MP Tim Wilson, in what had previously been considered to exist the safety seat of Goldstein, drew national attention to his independent challenger Zoe Daniel when he made legal objections to posting of entrada signs past volunteers on the fences of private residences.[40] This too led to a significant increase in donations to the Daniel Campaign.[41]

By businesses [edit]

In April 2007, a group of companies that used Avant-garde Access Content System (AACS) encryption issued terminate-and-desist letters demanding that the system's 128-bit (16-byte) numerical key (represented in hexadecimal as 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0) exist removed from several high-profile websites, including Digg. With the numerical key and some software, information technology was possible to decrypt the video content on HD-DVDs. This led to the central'south proliferation across other sites and chat rooms in various formats, with ane commentator describing it every bit having go "the most famous number on the Internet".[42] Inside a month, the primal had been reprinted on over 280,000 pages, had been printed on T-shirts and tattoos, had been published equally a book, and had appeared on YouTube in a vocal played over 45,000 times.[43]

In September 2009, multi-national oil visitor Trafigura obtained a super-injunction to forbid The Guardian paper from reporting on an internal Trafigura investigation into the 2006 Ivory coast toxic waste dump scandal. A super-injunction prevents reporting on even the existence of the injunction. Using parliamentary privilege, Labour MP Paul Farrelly referred to the super-injunction in a parliamentary question, and on October 12, 2009, The Guardian reported that it had been gagged from reporting on the parliamentary question, in violation of the 1689 Bill of Rights.[44] [45] Blogger Richard Wilson correctly identified the blocked question as referring to the Trafigura waste dump scandal, later which The Spectator suggested the aforementioned. Not long later on, Trafigura began trending on Twitter, helped along by Stephen Fry'south retweeting the story to his followers.[46] Twitter users soon tracked downwardly all details of the example, and by October 16, the super-injunction had been lifted and the written report published.[47]

In Nov 2012, Casey Movers, a Boston moving company, threatened to sue a woman in Hingham Commune Courtroom for libel in response to a negative Yelp review. The adult female's hubby wrote a blog post about the situation, which was then picked upwards by Techdirt [48] and Consumerist.[49] By the end of the calendar week, the company was reviewed past the Better Business organization Bureau, which later revoked its accreditation.[50]

In December 2013, YouTube user ghostlyrich uploaded video proof that his Samsung Galaxy S4 battery had spontaneously defenseless fire. Samsung had demanded proof before honoring its warranty. Once Samsung learned of the YouTube video, it added additional conditions to its warranty, enervating ghostlyrich delete his YouTube video, promise not to upload like material, officially atone the company of all liability, waive his right to bring a lawsuit, and never make the terms of the understanding public. Samsung also demanded that a witness authenticate the settlement proposal. When ghostlyrich shared Samsung'southward settlement proposal online, his original video drew ane.2 million views in one calendar week.[51] [52]

In August 2014, it was reported that Wedlock Street Invitee House in Hudson, New York, had a policy that "in that location will be a $500 fine that will be deducted from your deposit for every negative review of USGH [Union Street Guest Business firm] placed on any Internet site by anyone in your political party and/or attention your wedding or event."[53] The policy had been used in an attempt to suppress an unfavorable Nov 2013 Yelp review.[54] Thousands of negative reviews of the policy were posted to Yelp and other review sites.[55]

In September 2018, The Verge, an American applied science news and media network operated by Vocalism Media, published an article titled "How to Build a Custom PC for Editing, Gaming or Coding" and uploaded a video to YouTube titled "How we Congenital a $2000 Custom Gaming PC", which was widely criticized for its instructions that would have been harmful or unsafe to both the computer and user if followed, and its numerous factual errors, such as claiming anti-vibration pads were for electric insulation, and confusing naught ties with tweezers.[56] [57] In February 2019, Vox Media started issuing DMCA takedown notices to YouTube channels which posted content using clips from the video, most notably to technology channels Bitwit and ReviewTechUSA,[56] [58] bringing further attending to the video and the related content they attempted to suppress.[56] After an outcry following the decision, YouTube reinstated these two videos, forth with retracting the copyright "strikes" applied.[59]

On twenty Feb 2020, Apple filed a legal complaint against the sales of the German-language book App Store Confidential, written by a former High german App Store managing director, Tom Sadowski. Apple tree cited confidential business information as the reason for requesting the sales ban. Nonetheless, the publicity brought on by the media caused the book to reach number two on the Amazon bestseller list in Deutschland. The book was before long on its second impress run.[sixty]

In Oct 2020, the RIAA filed a DMCA takedown against the youtube-dl repository on GitHub, resulting in the repository and several forks existence taken down. Within days, hundreds of forks of the repository appeared on GitHub.[61]

By other organizations [edit]

In January 2008, The Church building of Scientology'due south attempts to get Cyberspace websites to delete a video of Tom Cruise speaking virtually Scientology resulted in the creation of Project Chanology.[62] [63] [64]

On December 5, 2008, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) added the English Wikipedia article near the 1976 Scorpions album Virgin Killer to a kid pornography blacklist, considering the album'south cover art "a potentially illegal indecent paradigm of a child under the age of eighteen".[62] The commodity quickly became 1 of the most pop pages on the site,[65] and the publicity surrounding the IWF action resulted in the paradigm existence spread beyond other sites.[66] The IWF was afterward reported on the BBC News website to have said "IWF's overriding objective is to minimise the availability of indecent images of children on the Internet, however, on this occasion our efforts accept had the opposite effect".[67] This issue was also noted past the IWF in its statement virtually the removal of the URL from the blacklist.[68] [69]

In June 2012, Argyll and Bute Council in Scotland banned a ix-twelvemonth-former primary school pupil from updating her blog, NeverSeconds, with photos of lunchtime meals served in the school'south canteen. The blog, which was already pop, started receiving a large number of views due to the international media furor that followed the ban. Inside days, the quango reversed its decision under immense public pressure and scrutiny. After the reversal of the ban, the weblog became more popular than information technology was earlier.[lxx]

By individuals [edit]

In May 2011, Premier League footballer Ryan Giggs sued Twitter later on a user revealed that Giggs was the subject of an anonymous privacy injunction (informally referred to as a "super-injunction"[71]) that prevented the publication of details regarding an alleged affair with model and old Big Blood brother contestant Imogen Thomas. A blogger for the Forbes website observed that the British media, which were banned from breaking the terms of the injunction, had mocked the footballer for non understanding the effect.[72] Dan Sabbagh from The Guardian afterwards posted a graph detailing—without naming the player—the number of references to the histrion's name against time, showing a large fasten following the news that the player was seeking legal action.[73]

Similar situations involving super-injunctions in England and Wales have occurred, ane involving Jeremy Clarkson.[74] Since January 2016 a celebrity (subsequently revealed outside England and Wales to exist David Furnish) used the injunction granted in PJS v News Group Newspapers to prevent media in England and Wales reporting events that have been featured in Scottish media and on the Internet.[75] [76]

A satirical play, Two Brothers and the Lions, was written by French playwright Hédi Tillette de Clermont-Tonnerre, nigh two wealthy British people who live in a castle on the Channel Isle of Brecqhou, "who become cold, selfish monsters in the eye of our democratic societies". In reality the billionaire Barclay brothers, owners of the Daily Telegraph newspaper amid other holdings, live in a castle on the island. David Barclay sued the playwright in France for defamation and invasion of privacy, though the Barclays were not named in the play. The playwright's lawyer described the play as "a satirical legend on capitalism". Tillette de Clermont-Tonnerre acknowledged that the play was partly inspired by the lives of the brothers. But he said it vicious within his right to freedom of expression, and said the play had been commissioned to explore the issue of the continued being of mediaeval Norman law in the Channel Islands, while ruminating on the nature and future of capitalism. In July 2019 Barclay lost the example. The play had been obscure and but played in small theatres, though critically acclaimed; after the lawsuit performances were scheduled in cities beyond France.[77]

Luke O'Neill, an Irish immunologist writing in The Guardian,[78] opined that Bret Stephens, an American Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, in 2019 achieved "every bit close to the perfect Streisand effect every bit one could imagine" by writing an email to David Karpf, an associate professor of media and public diplomacy, whose tweet calling Stephens a "bedbug" had attracted insignificant interest, saying "I'thousand often amazed about the things supposedly decent people are prepared to say nearly other people — people they've never met — on Twitter. I think you've set a new standard."; Stephens cc'd on the electronic mail the provost of George Washington University at which Karpf worked. Karpf retaliated confronting Stephens, by posting the email publicly on Twitter, and by writing an op ed criticizing Stephens in the Los Angeles Times.[79] [80] Stephens was mocked on Twitter, deleted his Twitter business relationship, and the story was picked up by media.[81] [lxxx] [82]

The Streisand effect has been observed in relation to the right to exist forgotten, the correct in some jurisdictions to have private data nearly a person removed from internet searches and other directories nether some circumstances, as a litigant attempting to remove information from search engines risks the litigation itself beingness reported as valid, electric current news.[83] [84]

In 2019 writer Andrew Seidel sent a copy of his book The Founding Myth: Why Christian Nationalism Is Un-American to conservative evangelical pastor Greg Locke in the promise of starting a conversation about the issues discussed in it. Locke said that he had no intention of reading the volume, and burnt it, posting video of the burning on his social media accounts. Response to the video included many replies expressing the intention to buy and read the book, and to donate copies to libraries.[85]

See also [edit]

  • Banned in Boston – Phrase used to describe a work prohibited in Boston
  • Blowback (intelligence) – Unintended issue of covert operations, typically involving rogue terrorist groups
  • DSMA-Observe – Britain request to not publish information (popularly known as a "D notice")
  • Gag order – Legal gild to restrict publication
  • Hydra effect – Paradox originating from the Greek legend of the Lernaean Hydra
  • List of eponymous laws – Adages and sayings named after a person
    • Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Anderson – Activity to cake publication of vulnerability
    • The History of Sexuality – Four-volume book by Michel Foucault
  • McLibel case – Legal action against and by activists
  • Perverse incentive – Incentive that has an contrary result ("Cobra effect")
  • Reactance (psychology) – Unpleasant emotion experienced when behavioral liberty is threatened
  • Red triangle (Channel four) – Adult content warning
  • Royal Family (movie)
  • Strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) – Litigation to silence critics
  • Succès de scandale – Term significant "success from scandal"
  • Super-injunctions – In England and Wales, injunctions whose existence and details may not exist legally reported, in addition to facts or allegations which may not exist disclosed

References [edit]

  1. ^ "The Streisand Upshot". Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam Webster lexicon. Retrieved March 25, 2019.
  2. ^ a b Canton, David (November v, 2005). "Today's Business concern Law: Endeavour to suppress can backfire". London Free Press. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved July 21, 2007. The 'Streisand effect' is what happens when someone tries to suppress something and the opposite occurs. The human action of suppressing information technology raises the contour, making it much more well known than it ever would have been.
  3. ^ Mugrabi, Sunshine (January 22, 2007). "YouTube – Censored? Offending Paula Abdul clips are abruptly taken down". Blood-red Herring. Archived from the original on Feb xviii, 2007. Retrieved July 21, 2007. Another unintended consequence of this motility could be that it extends the kerfuffle over Ms. Abdul's behavior rather than quelling it. Mr. Nguyen called this the 'Barbra Streisand effect', referring to that actress'south insistence that paparazzi photos of her mansion not be used
  4. ^ Burnett, Dean (May 22, 2015). "Why regime censorship [in no style at all] carries greater risks than benefits". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on April 24, 2016. Retrieved April 16, 2016.
  5. ^ Siegel, Robert (February 29, 2008). "The Streisand Upshot' Snags Effort to Hide Documents". All Things Considered. NPR. Archived from the original on March 6, 2018. The episode is the latest example of a phenomenon known equally the 'Streisand Result.' Robert Siegel talks with Mike Masnick, CEO of Techdirt Inc., who coined the term.
  6. ^ a b Masnick, Mike (January eight, 2015). "For 10 Years Everyone'southward Been Using 'The Streisand Effect' Without Paying; Now I'm Going to Showtime Issuing Takedowns". Techdirt. Archived from the original on April 15, 2016. Retrieved April 16, 2016.
  7. ^ Barbara Streisand five. Kenneth Adelman Et. Al. , Cal.Super. (Superior Court of California, Canton of Los Angeles 5/20/2003)No. SC077257
  8. ^ "The perils of the Streisand Result". BBC News Magazine. July 31, 2014. Archived from the original on January 13, 2016.
  9. ^ Bernoff, Josh; Li, Charlene (2008). Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies . Boston: Harvard Business School Press. p. 7. ISBN978-i-4221-2500-seven.
  10. ^ "Since When Is It Illegal to Simply Mention a Trademark Online?". Techdirt. Archived from the original on November xxx, 2012.
  11. ^ "Barbra Sues Over Aerial Photos". The Smoking Gun. May xxx, 2003. Archived from the original on April 17, 2011. Retrieved November 22, 2010.
  12. ^ "California Coastal Records Project". californiacoastline.org. Archived from the original on April 7, 2008.
  13. ^ Tentative ruling, page six, stating, "Image 3850 was download six times, twice to the Internet accost of counsel for plaintiff". In addition, two prints of the picture were ordered—one past Streisand'due south counsel and ane by Streisand's neighbor. "Archived re-create" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on Baronial 24, 2015. Retrieved September 24, 2014. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived re-create as title (link)
  14. ^ Rogers, Paul (June 24, 2003). "Photo of Streisand home becomes an Internet hit". San Jose Mercury News, mirrored at californiacoastline.org. Archived from the original on July 30, 2013. Retrieved June 15, 2007.
  15. ^ Streisand five. Adelman, et al., in California Superior Court; Instance SC077257
  16. ^ Adelman, Kenneth (May thirteen, 2007). "Barbra Streisand Sues to Suppress Free Speech Protection for Widely Acclaimed Website". California Littoral Records Project. Archived from the original on April 7, 2008. Retrieved April viii, 2008.
  17. ^ "Streisand's Lawsuit to Silence Coastal Website Dismissed" (Press release). Mindfully.org. December 3, 2003. Archived from the original on July 6, 2009. Retrieved April viii, 2008.
  18. ^ "Blog standard: Authoritarian governments can lock up bloggers. It is harder to outwit them". The Economist. June 26, 2008. Archived from the original on January 24, 2011. Retrieved Dec 6, 2010. WHAT practise Barbra Streisand and the Tunisian president, Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, have in common? They both tried to block textile they dislike from appearing on the internet.
  19. ^ Communiqué from the Wikimedia Foundation, April 6, 2013[ round reference ]
  20. ^ Geuss, Megan. "Wikipedia editor allegedly forced by French intelligence to delete "classified" entry". Archived from the original on April 8, 2013. Retrieved April six, 2013.
  21. ^ Sampson, Tim (February 19, 2014). "Greek politico who sued Wikipedia editor clearly never heard of the Streisand Effect". Daily Dot. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016.
  22. ^ Watson, Amanda (Nov 6, 2017). "Pauw's new volume is in the public interest". The Citizen . Retrieved August xviii, 2018.
  23. ^ "Outset xx,000 'The President's Keepers' books sold". enca.com. November five, 2017. Retrieved Nov 7, 2017.
  24. ^ Applebaum, Anne (February 2, 2018). "The stupidity and unenforceability of Poland'southward oral communication law". The Washington Mail service . Retrieved March 15, 2018.
  25. ^ a b Hackmann, Jörg (2018). "Defending the 'Skillful Name' of the Smooth Nation: Politics of History every bit a Battlefield in Poland, 2015–18". Periodical of Genocide Enquiry. xx (4): 587–606. doi:x.1080/14623528.2018.1528742. S2CID 81922100.
  26. ^ Poland's Ramble Breakdown, Wojciech Sadurski, Oxford University Press, page 155
  27. ^ Soroka, George; Krawatzek, Félix (2019). "Nationalism, Democracy, and Retentiveness Laws". Periodical of Republic. 30 (2): 157–171. doi:10.1353/jod.2019.0032. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 159294126.
  28. ^ Noack, Rick (Feb 2, 2018). "Poland's Senate passes Holocaust complicity bill despite concerns from U.Southward., Israel". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved Feb 2, 2018.
  29. ^ Ray, Larry; Kapralski, Sławomir (2019). "Introduction to the special result – disputed Holocaust memory in Poland". Holocaust Studies. 25 (3): 209–219. doi:10.1080/17504902.2019.1567657.
  30. ^ Cherviatsova, Alina (2020). "Retentivity as a battlefield: European memorial laws and liberty of voice communication". The International Journal of Human Rights. 25 (four): 675–694. doi:10.1080/13642987.2020.1791826. S2CID 225574752.
  31. ^ Hobbs, William R.; Roberts, Margaret Due east. (August 2018). "How Sudden Censorship Can Increase Access to Information". American Political Science Review. 112 (iii): 621–636. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000084. ISSN 0003-0554.
  32. ^ Chen, Yuyu; Yang, David Y. (2018). "The Impact of Media Censorship: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Mainland china" (PDF). Graduate Schoolhouse of Concern. Stanford Academy. Retrieved February fifteen, 2020.
  33. ^ Pan, Jennifer; Siegel, Alexandra A. (February 2020). "How Saudi Crackdowns Fail to Silence Online Dissent" (PDF). American Political Scientific discipline Review. 114 (1): 109–125. doi:ten.1017/S0003055419000650. ISSN 0003-0554. S2CID 204964643. Retrieved February 15, 2020.
  34. ^ Pan, Jennifer and Siegel (January three, 2020). "Replication Data for: How Saudi Crackdowns Neglect to Silence Online Dissent". American Political Science Review. Harvard Dataverse. doi:10.7910/DVN/9AMKHL.
  35. ^ Holson, Laura (March 20, 2019). "After Devin Nunes Sues @DevinCow, the Twitter Parody Gains a Half-Million Followers". The New York Times . Retrieved September 8, 2020.
  36. ^ Masnick, Mike. "Prc's Efforts To Hide Its Muslim Concentration Camps Helped Reporters To Find Them". TechDirt . Retrieved August 31, 2020.
  37. ^ Morris, Emma-Jo; Fonrouge, Gabrielle (October 14, 2020). "Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad". New York Post . Retrieved Oct 20, 2020.
  38. ^ "Twitter bans ads from RT and Sputnik over election interference". The Guardian. October 26, 2017. Retrieved April 14, 2022. Company announced conclusion following U.s. intelligence community's decision that Russian media outlets sought to interfere with the United states election
  39. ^ "Twitter's ban almost doubled attention for Biden misinformation". MIT Technology Review . Retrieved October 20, 2020.
  40. ^ "Memo to political campaigners: remember Barbra Streisand's mansion". Retrieved March 26, 2022.
  41. ^ "Hey Tim Wilson MP, On Wed, you tried to plough neighbour against neighbour". Retrieved March 11, 2022.
  42. ^ Rock, Brad (May 3, 2007). "In Spider web Uproar, Antipiracy Lawmaking Spreads Wildly". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 11, 2008. The ironic thing is, because they tried to quiet it down information technology's the most famous number on the Internet.
  43. ^ Greenberg, Andy (May 11, 2007). "The Streisand Effect". Forbes. Archived from the original on March seven, 2008. Retrieved February 29, 2008. The phenomenon takes its proper name from Barbra Streisand, who made her own ill-fated attempt at reining in the Web in 2003. That's when ecology activist Kenneth Adelman posted aeriform photos of Streisand'due south Malibu beach house on his Web site every bit office of an ecology survey, and she responded by suing him for $50 million. Until the lawsuit, few people had spotted Streisand's firm, Adelman says—just the lawsuit brought more than than a 1000000 visitors to Adelman's Spider web site, he estimates. Streisand's instance was dismissed, and Adelman's photo was picked up past the Associated Press and reprinted in newspapers effectually the globe.
  44. ^ Leigh, David (October 12, 2009). "Guardian gagged from reporting parliament". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on October v, 2013. Retrieved May 21, 2011.
  45. ^ Leigh, David (October 13, 2009). "Guardian seeks urgent court hearing over parliament reporting gag". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on October v, 2013. Retrieved May 21, 2011.
  46. ^ Jacobson, Seth. "Twitter claims new scalp as Trafigura backs downward". The Get-go Post. Archived from the original on August 28, 2010. Retrieved May 21, 2011.
  47. ^ Beckford, Martin; Watt, Holly (Oct 16, 2009). "Secret Trafigura report said 'likely cause' of illness was release of toxic gas from dumped waste material". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on July 31, 2017.
  48. ^ Masnick, Mike. "Latest Company to Detect the Streisand Effect: Casey Movers". Techdirt. Archived from the original on November 17, 2012. Retrieved November 15, 2012.
  49. ^ Moran, Chris. "Moving Visitor Picks The Wrong Person To Threaten To Sue Over Bad Yelp Review". Consumerist. Archived from the original on Nov 16, 2012. Retrieved November xiv, 2012.
  50. ^ "Casey Moving Company". Better Concern Bureau. Archived from the original on Nov xi, 2013. Retrieved September 17, 2013.
  51. ^ Klee, Miles. "Samsung's Response to a Customer whose Phone Defenseless Burn down Only Fabricated Things Worse". Daily Dot. Archived from the original on December 11, 2013. Retrieved Dec 9, 2013.
  52. ^ Levy, Gabrielle (December 11, 2013). "S4 catches burn down, Samsung tries to silence study". United Press International. Archived from the original on December 24, 2013. Retrieved December 23, 2013.
  53. ^ Siegler, Mara (Baronial iv, 2014). "Hotel fines $500 for every bad review posted online". Page Six, New York Mail. Archived from the original on August 18, 2014. Retrieved August eighteen, 2014.
  54. ^ Simon R. (2013). "Union Street Guest House: Hudson, NY (review)". Yelp. Archived from the original on August xix, 2014. Retrieved August 18, 2014.
  55. ^ "This Hotel Fines Customers $500 for Bad Reviews (Yep, There'due south a Meliorate Arroyo)". Forbes. Archived from the original on August xix, 2014. Retrieved August xviii, 2014.
  56. ^ a b c Lee, Timothy B. (Feb 20, 2019). "Vocalism lawyers briefly censored YouTubers who mocked The Verge's bad PC build advice". Ars Technica . Retrieved February 21, 2019.
  57. ^ Megalith. "[H]ardOCP: The Verge Ridiculed for "How Nosotros Built a $2000 Custom Gaming PC" Video". [H]ard|OCP . Retrieved February 13, 2019.
  58. ^ Medley, Sam (February 15, 2019). "The Verge bug copyright claims against multiple YouTube videos criticizing its infamous PC build video". Notebookcheck . Retrieved Feb 21, 2019.
  59. ^ Knight, Shawn (Feb xiv, 2019). "Phonation Media targets YouTuber that parodied The Verge's terrible PC build video". TechSpot. Retrieved Feb sixteen, 2018.
  60. ^ Lovejoy, Ben (February 21, 2020). "New Apple book hits #2 on German bestseller list following attempted ban". 9to5Mac.
  61. ^ "Aroused YouTube-dl users overflowing GitHub with new repos later on takedown". BleepingComputer.
  62. ^ a b Arthur, Charles (March 20, 2009). "The Streisand effect: Secrecy in the digital historic period". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on September half dozen, 2013. Retrieved March 31, 2010.
  63. ^ "The Streisand Effect: When Internet Censorship Backfires". Complex. July 24, 2009. Archived from the original on April 29, 2010. Retrieved Apr 27, 2010.
  64. ^ "What is 'The Streisand Outcome'?". The Daily Telegraph. London. January 31, 2009. Archived from the original on June eight, 2011. Retrieved March 31, 2010.
  65. ^ Metz, Cade (Dec vii, 2008). "Brit ISPs censor Wikipedia over 'child porn' album cover". The Register. Archived from the original on June 8, 2011. Retrieved December 9, 2008.
  66. ^ Moses, Asher (Dec eight, 2008). "Wikipedia added to child pornography blacklist". The Sydney Forenoon Herald. Archived from the original on September 17, 2012. Retrieved December ix, 2008.
  67. ^ "IWF backs downward on Wiki censorship". BBC News. December 9, 2008. Archived from the original on December 11, 2008. Retrieved December nine, 2008.
  68. ^ "Living with the Streisand Effect". International Herald Tribune. Dec 26, 2008. Archived from the original on January 14, 2009. Retrieved December 29, 2008.
  69. ^ "IWF statement regarding Wikipedia webpage" (Press release). Cyberspace Lookout Foundation. Dec 9, 2008. Archived from the original on January 1, 2011. Retrieved September 24, 2013.
  70. ^ Cacciottolo, Mario (June 15, 2012). "The Streisand Effect: When censorship backfires". BBC News. Archived from the original on March eleven, 2016.
  71. ^ Townend, Judith (May 20, 2011). "Lord Neuberger's report cuts through the superinjunction hysteria". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 22, 2013. Retrieved May 21, 2011.
  72. ^ Loma, Kashmir (September xxx, 2009). "He-Who-Cannot-Be-Named (In The United kingdom) Sues Twitter Over A User Naming Him". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 22, 2011. Retrieved May 21, 2011. Apparently, though, CTB'due south lawyers have not heard of the "Streisand effect".
  73. ^ Sabbagh, Dan (May 20, 2011). "Twitter and the mystery footballer". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 21, 2014. Retrieved May 24, 2011.
  74. ^ Garavelli, Dani (March xiv, 2015). "Terminate of the road for Clarkson?". The Scotsman. Archived from the original on April 25, 2016. Retrieved Apr sixteen, 2016.
  75. ^ "This celebrity injunction volition probably rebound—a case of the 'Streisand event'". The Guardian. London. April 11, 2016. Archived from the original on April xiv, 2016. Retrieved April xvi, 2016.
  76. ^ "British papers tin report Furnish's infidelity". The Straits Times. April xx, 2016. Retrieved December eleven, 2018.
  77. ^ Waterson, Jim (July 3, 2019). "David Barclay loses libel case against obscure French playwright". The Guardian . Retrieved July three, 2019.
  78. ^ "Luke O'Neill". The Guardian.
  79. ^ Karpf, David (August 28, 2019). "Op-Ed: I fabricated a joke about Bret Stephens and bedbugs. His response was never about civility". Los Angeles Times.
  80. ^ a b Rupar, Aaron (August 27, 2019). "Bret Stephens'due south "bedbug" meltdown, explained". Vocalisation.
  81. ^ O'Neil, Luke (Baronial 27, 2019). "NYT columnist quits Twitter after daring critic to 'call me a bedbug to my face up'". The Guardian.
  82. ^ Mathis-Lilley, Ben (Baronial 27, 2019). "A Q&A With the Human Who Chosen Bret Stephens a Bedbug". Slate.
  83. ^ "Google's right to exist forgotten creates Streisand effect". Recombu. July 3, 2014. Archived from the original on Dec 8, 2014.
  84. ^ "Techno File: Exercising 'right to be forgotten' could spark 'Streisand effect'". BDlive. July 23, 2014. Archived from the original on July 25, 2014.
  85. ^ Khan, Aysha (October 24, 2019). "Tennessee pastor posts video burning book that critiques Christian nationalism". Religion News Service. Archived from the original on Feb 1, 2021. Retrieved February 1, 2021.

External links [edit]

  • "The perils of the Streisand issue". Parkinson, Justin. BBC News, July 31, 2014.

schockwhirosed1942.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

0 Response to "You Can Sit Around and Wait a Hundred Years but You Ain t Gonna Hear Anything Like This Again"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel